Published October 25, 2019 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Comparison of computational methods for the electrochemical stability window of solid-state electrolyte materials

  • 1. Cognitive Computing and Computational Sciences Department, IBM Research – Zurich, Saumerstrasse 4, CH-8803 Ruschlikon, Switzerland

* Contact person

Description

Superior stability and safety are key promises attributed to all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) containing solid-state electrolyte (SSE) in comparison to their conventional counterparts utilizing liquid electrolyte. To unfold the full potential of ASSBs, SSE materials are desirable that are stable in contact with both the low and the high potential electrode. The electrochemical stability window is conveniently used to assess the SSE--electrode interface stability. In the present work, we review the most important methods to compute the SSE stability window. We find that the stoichiometry stability method represents a bridge between HOMO--LUMO method and phase stability method (grand canonical phase diagram). We further provide implementations of these methods for SSE material screening and we compare their results for the relevant Li- and Na-SSE materials LGPS, LIPON, LLZO, LLTO, LATP, LISICON, and NASICON.

Files

File preview

files_description.md

All files

Files (10.1 MiB)

Name Size
md5:8f5db04cd7687a5cf70cb32a7c460e74
416 Bytes Preview Download
md5:bb93254d4f63bc28ea385219cb83df54
10.1 MiB Download
md5:d2e37aad81b4cd72afd2b37eb653a0be
21.6 KiB Download
md5:3808649c871a85feb2ebe4503480b18b
842 Bytes Preview Download
md5:ddf5f5bfe0f982ae831f5189afd08702
1.0 KiB Preview Download

References

Preprint (Preprint where the data is discussed)
T.Binninger, A. Marcolongo, M. Mottet, V. Weber, T.Laino, arXiv:1901.02251